Osorio v. Ashcroft
This text of 81 F. App'x 659 (Osorio v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Edgar Rafael Gonzalez Osorio, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We [660]*660have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion. Cano-Merida v. INS, 311 F.3d 960, 964 (9th Cir.2002). We deny the petition.
The BIA’s denial of Gonzalez’s motion for reconsideration was not “arbitrary, irrational, or contrary to law,” because the BIA previously considered the contentions it raised and determined they did not identify any legal errors. See Caruncho v. INS, 68 F.3d 356, 360 (9th Cir.1995).
To the extent Gonzalez seeks review of the BIA’s October 8, 2002 order affirming the immigration judge’s denial of his requests for asylum and withholding of removal, we lack jurisdiction to consider the order because the petition for review is not timely as to that order. See Stone v. INS, 514 U.S. 386, 405, 115 S.Ct. 1537, 131 L.Ed.2d 465 (1995).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
81 F. App'x 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osorio-v-ashcroft-ca9-2003.