Osoba v. City of Beacon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Osoba v. City of Beacon

57 A.D.2d 588, 393 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11577

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 57 A.D.2d 588 (Osoba v. City of Beacon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osoba v. City of Beacon, 57 A.D.2d 588, 393 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11577 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondents to reinstate petitioners to their positions with the Department of Public Works of the City of Beacon, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated February 7, 1977, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Article X of the collective bargaining agreement in issue, entitled "Job Security”, does not bar dismissals caused by extreme economic necessity (see Yonkers School Crossing Guard Union of Westchester Ch., CSEA v City of Yonkers, 39 NY2d 964). It is not explicit, unambiguous and comprehensive, as was the "job security” clause considered and enforced in Matter of Board of Educ. v Yonkers Federation of Teachers (40 NY2d 268). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel respondents to reinstate petitioners to their positions with the Department of Public Works of the City of Beacon, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, dated February 7, 1977, which dismissed the petition. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Article X of the collective bargaining agreement in issue, entitled "Job Security”, does not bar dismissals caused by extreme economic necessity (see Yonkers School Crossing Guard Union of Westchester Ch., CSEA v City of Yonkers, 39 NY2d 964). It is not explicit, unambiguous and comprehensive, as was the "job security” clause considered and enforced in Matter of Board of Educ. v Yonkers Federation of Teachers (40 NY2d 268). Cohalan, Acting P. J., Hawkins, Mollen and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 A.D.2d 588, 393 N.Y.S.2d 596, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osoba-v-city-of-beacon-nyappdiv-1977.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack