Osmun v. Wall

107 S.W.2d 997, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 760
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 15, 1937
DocketNo. 3211.
StatusPublished

This text of 107 S.W.2d 997 (Osmun v. Wall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osmun v. Wall, 107 S.W.2d 997, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 760 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

WALKER, Chief Justice.

Appellee, Mrs. J. D. Wall, alleged that she was injured on the 16th day of February, A. D. 1936, by appellant Fred N. Os-mun running an automobile which he was driving into the back end of an automobile in which she was riding; that Osmun was the agent and driver of appellant Bowen Company of Texas, Inc., and was operating the car for his employer at the time of the collision; she alleged facts constituting a trespass in Angelina county, the nature and extent of her injuries, and Other facts necessary to constitute a cause of action against appellants for the injuries suffered by her. Appellants answered by separate pleas of privilege, to which appellee filed controverting affidavits. The pleas of privilege were overruled, and appellants have duly prosecuted their appeal to this court.

The principal point urged by appellants is that appellee did not introduce proof, sustain the jurisdictional allegations of her petition and her controverting affidavit; in a" brief filed by her, she confesses error against her judgment, and prays that the judgment of the lower court be reversed and the cause remanded to the district court of Angelina county for a new trial. Appellants pray that we enter our order, transferring the case to Harris county, the place of their residence and principal place of business.

It reasonably appears to us that appellee, on another trial, can sustain her venue in Angelina county.

The judgment of the lower court is reversed, and the cause remanded to the, *998 trial court for a new trial. Daniel v. Henslee (Tex.Civ.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 197; Bender v. Armstrong (Tex.Civ.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 778.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Daniel v. Henslee
94 S.W.2d 197 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Bender v. Armstrong
88 S.W.2d 778 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 S.W.2d 997, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osmun-v-wall-texapp-1937.