Osmun v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Osmun v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 162, 2 Daily L.N. 589

CourtMichigan Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 5, 1895

DocketNo. 15153

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 162 (Osmun v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osmun v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 162, 2 Daily L.N. 589 (Mich. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

To dismiss an appeal taken by relator from the report of commissioners on claims and set aside the order of the commissioners making the allowance, on the ground that the claim is a contingent one-' under 3 ITow. Stat., Sec. 5932, and that the sole duty of the commissioners was to take the proofs and report the same to the Probate Court.

Denied November 5, 1895, with costs, on the ground that a claim upon a note, payable absolutely, secured by a real estate mortgage, is not, as between the holder and the estate of the maker, a contingent claim.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To dismiss an appeal taken by relator from the report of commissioners on claims and set aside the order of the commissioners making the allowance, on the ground that the claim is a contingent one-' under 3 ITow. Stat., Sec. 5932, and that the sole duty of the commissioners was to take the proofs and report the same to the Probate Court.

Denied November 5, 1895, with costs, on the ground that a claim upon a note, payable absolutely, secured by a real estate mortgage, is not, as between the holder and the estate of the maker, a contingent claim.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 162, 2 Daily L.N. 589, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osmun-v-circuit-judge-mich-1895.