OSMANY HARO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of OSMANY HARO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA (OSMANY HARO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed July 14, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D21-1197 Lower Tribunal No. F16-567B ________________
Osmany Haro, Appellant,
vs.
The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, William Altfield, Judge.
Osmany Haro, in proper person.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.
Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and BOKOR, JJ.
FERNANDEZ, C.J.
Osmany Haro appeals the trial court order denying his motion for post-
conviction relief based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Haro claims that his lawyer was ineffective by failing to obtain jail credit for 113 days that Haro
spent in custody in Colorado fighting extradition to Florida. The trial court
denied the motion finding that Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801
requires that motions for jail credit be filed within one year from the time that
the judgment and sentence became final. According to the trial court, Haro
pleaded guilty and was sentenced on May 3, 2018, and he filed his motion
for post-conviction relief on December 9, 2019,
In Gisi v. State, 135 So. 3d 493, 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014), our sister
court concluded that “[a]lthough the court commentary to rule 3.801 states
that ‘[a]ll jail credit issues must be handled pursuant to this rule,’ the rule
does not apply to claims of jail credit for the time a defendant was
incarcerated outside the state while awaiting sentencing.” This is because
the rule refers to Florida Statute Section 921.161 (2012), and the Florida
Supreme Court held that jail credit awarded pursuant to the statute applies
only to Florida county jail time. See Kronz v. State, 462 So. 2d 450, 451 (Fla.
1985) (“[W]e conclude that section 921.161(1) requires the trial judge to give
credit only for time served in Florida county jails pending disposition of
criminal charges.”)
2 Because the motion for post-conviction relief was timely filed pursuant
to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, we reverse and remand for
further proceedings.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
OSMANY HARO v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osmany-haro-v-the-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2021.