OSK IX, LLC v. Desir

2024 NY Slip Op 32224(U)
CourtNew York Supreme Court, New York County
DecidedJuly 1, 2024
StatusUnpublished

This text of 2024 NY Slip Op 32224(U) (OSK IX, LLC v. Desir) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court, New York County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
OSK IX, LLC v. Desir, 2024 NY Slip Op 32224(U) (N.Y. Super. Ct. 2024).

Opinion

OSK IX, LLC v Desir 2024 NY Slip Op 32224(U) July 1, 2024 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Index No. 651375/2020 Judge: Debra A. James Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are republished from various New York State and local government sources, including the New York State Unified Court System's eCourts Service. This opinion is uncorrected and not selected for official publication. INDEX NO. 651375/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2024

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: HON. DEBRA A. JAMES PART 59 Justice ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------X INDEX NO. 651375/2020 OSK IX, LLC, MOTION DATE 02/04/2021 Plaintiff, MOTION SEQ. NO. 001 - V -

JACQUES DESIR, DECISION + ORDER ON MOTION Defendant. ------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------X

The following e-filed documents, listed by NYSCEF document number (Motion 001) 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27 were read on this motion to/for JUDGMENT - DEFAULT

Upon the foregoing documents, it is

ORDERED that the plaintiff's application for an order that

deems the filing of the affidavit of service of the summons and

complaint as timely, pursuant to CPLR §§ 2001 and 2004, is

granted, without opposition; and it is further

ORDERED that that portion of the plaintiff's action that seeks

the recovery of attorney's fees is severed and the issue of the

amount of reasonable attorney's fees that plaintiff may recover

from the defendant Jacques Desir is referred to a Special Referee

to hear and report; and it is further

ORDERED that counsel for the plaintiff shall, within thirty

(30) days from the date of this order, serve a copy of this order

with notice of entry, together with a completed Information Sheet,

upon the Special Referee Clerk in the General Clerk's Office, who

651375/2020 OSK IX, LLC, vs. DESIR, JACQUES Page 1 of4 Motion No. 001

1 of 4 [* 1] INDEX NO. 651375/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2024

is directed to place this matter on the calendar of the Special

Referee's Part for the earliest convenient date; and it is further

ORDERED that such service upon the Special Referee Clerk shall

be made in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Protocol

on Courthouse and County Clerk Procedures for Electronically Filed

Cases (accessible at the "E-Filing" page on the court's website);

and it is further

ORDERED that any motion to confirm or disaffirm the Report of

the JHO/Special Referee shall be made within the time and in the

manner specified in CPLR 4403 and Section 202.44 of the Uniform

Rules for the Trial Courts; and it is further

ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for a default judgment

against defendant on the first cause of action for breach of

promissory note is granted, without opposition; and it is

further

ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter

judgement in favor of plaintiff and against defendant in the sum

of $311,030.91, plus interest in the amount of $42,546.62 as of

December 21, 2020, plus interest thereafter at rate of 3.750% per

annum until the entry of judgment in the amount of

$ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ,and thereafter at the statutory rate, as calculated

by the Clerk, together with costs and disbursements as taxed by

the Clerk upon submission of an appropriate bill of costs.

651375/2020 OSK IX, LLC, vs. DESIR, JACQUES Page 2 of 4 Motion No. 001

2 of 4 [* 2] INDEX NO. 651375/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2024

DECISION

In this action seeking damages for breach of a promissory

note, plaintiff OSK IX, LLC moves, pursuant to CPLR § 3215, for

a default judgment for the relief demanded on the first cause of

action of the complaint based on the failure of defendant Jacque

Desir to answer or appear.

On this motion, plaintiff has complied with the strictures

of CPLR 3215(f), having submitted proof of service of the

summons and complaint and proof of service of this motion upon

the defendant. Defendant has not opposed the application of

plaintiff, pursuant to CPLR §§ 2001 and 2004, to deem the filing

of the affidavit of service of the summons and complaint upon

defendant as timely, nunc pro tune. Defendant has defaulted in

appearance on this motion. Plaintiff has further submitted an

affidavit of a person with knowledge of the facts, as well as an

affirmation as to defendant's default pursuant to CPLR § 3215

(f). This motion is brought within one year of the default.

Having established the statutory requisites for entry of a

default judgment and as the breach of promissory note claim is

for a sum certain, plaintiff is entitled to the judgment it

seeks.

However, the issue of reasonable attorneys' fees that

plaintiff seeks to recover from defendant must be determined at

651375/2020 OSK IX, LLC, vs. DESIR, JACQUES Page 3 of 4 Motion No. 001

3 of 4 [* 3] INDEX NO. 651375/2020 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/01/2024

an evidentiary hearing. See Matakov v Kel-Tech Construction

Inc, 84 AD3d 677 (1 st Dept 2011).

P- ~ .A - } ~ 20240701171802DJ AME582300328F EDC465F8D4D46E7860988BE

7/1/2024 DATE DEBRA A. JAMES, J.S.C.

~ ~ CHECK ONE: CASE DISPOSED NON-FINAL DISPOSITION

□ DENIED □ GRANTED GRANTED IN PART OTHER

APPLICATION: SETTLE ORDER SUBMIT ORDER

CHECK IF APPROPRIATE: INCLUDES TRANSFER/REASSIGN FIDUCIARY APPOINTMENT 0 REFERENCE

651375/2020 OSK IX, LLC, vs. DESIR, JACQUES Page4 of 4 Motion No. 001

[* 4] 4 of 4

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matakov v. Kel-Tech Construction Inc.
84 A.D.3d 677 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 NY Slip Op 32224(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osk-ix-llc-v-desir-nysupctnewyork-2024.