Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Osinowo v. Secretary of the Port Authority

Osinowo v. Secretary of the Port Authority

212 A.D.2d 387, 623 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1238
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 7, 1995
StatusPublished

This text of 212 A.D.2d 387 (Osinowo v. Secretary of the Port Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osinowo v. Secretary of the Port Authority, 212 A.D.2d 387, 623 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1238 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Bertram Katz, J.), entered February 15, 1994, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiffs failure to commence the action within one year after his causes of action accrued, as mandated by McKinney’s Unconsolidated Laws of NY § 7107 (L 1950, ch 301, § 7), amounts to a jurisdictional defect requiring dismissal of the action (Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co. v Port Auth., 137 AD2d 796). Concur—Ellerin, J. P., Kupferman, Asch, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lumbermens Mutual Casualty v. Port Authority
137 A.D.2d 796 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
212 A.D.2d 387, 623 N.Y.S.2d 105, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osinowo-v-secretary-of-the-port-authority-nyappdiv-1995.