Oshlag v. Hammerling
This text of 281 A.D. 1047 (Oshlag v. Hammerling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, a real estate broke; sues for brokerage commissions and for damages for conspiracy on the part of both defendants to deprive him of his commissions. Defendant James appeals from an order insofar as it granted his examination before trial on certain items. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements; examination to proceed on five days' notice. No opinion. Add, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Schmidt and Beldock, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
281 A.D. 1047, 122 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oshlag-v-hammerling-nyappdiv-1953.