Oshinsky v. Standard Lakeside Corp.

Arlington County Circuit Court

Oshinsky v. Standard Lakeside Corp.

9 Va. Cir. 449, 1979 Va. Cir. LEXIS 22

CourtArlington County Circuit Court

DecidedOctober 30, 1979

DocketCase No. (Law) 21167

StatusPublished

This text of 9 Va. Cir. 449 (Oshinsky v. Standard Lakeside Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Arlington County Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oshinsky v. Standard Lakeside Corp., 9 Va. Cir. 449, 1979 Va. Cir. LEXIS 22 (Va. Super. Ct. 1979).

Pincite

Opinion

By JUDGE CHARLES H. DUFF

I have carefully considered the able arguments presented last Friday regarding the Defendants’ Motion Objecting to Venue of this action. The Motion must be denied.

Plaintiffs sue on an assignment of a lease to them with proper notice thereof being given to the Defendants. It is alleged that the rent due on August 1 and September 1, 1979, is in default.

The action, being for a breach of the contractual terms of the lease, does not fall within Sec. 8.01-261, Category A, or preferred venue. In my opinion it falls within Category B, or permissible venue, as outlined in Sec. 8.01-262. Paragraph 4 of that section provides a permissible forum "wherein the cause of action or any part thereof arose."

Payment was to be made at the location designated by the creditor, presumably Arlington County. Upon such payment not being made, the terms of the lease were breached and said breach occurred in Arlington County. Accordingly, it is my view that the cause of action arose in this county and venue is properly laid therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By JUDGE CHARLES H. DUFF

I have carefully considered the able arguments presented last Friday regarding the Defendants’ Motion Objecting to Venue of this action. The Motion must be denied.

Plaintiffs sue on an assignment of a lease to them with proper notice thereof being given to the Defendants. It is alleged that the rent due on August 1 and September 1, 1979, is in default.

The action, being for a breach of the contractual terms of the lease, does not fall within Sec. 8.01-261, Category A, or preferred venue. In my opinion it falls within Category B, or permissible venue, as outlined in Sec. 8.01-262. Paragraph 4 of that section provides a permissible forum "wherein the cause of action or any part thereof arose."

Payment was to be made at the location designated by the creditor, presumably Arlington County. Upon such payment not being made, the terms of the lease were breached and said breach occurred in Arlington County. Accordingly, it is my view that the cause of action arose in this county and venue is properly laid therein.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 Va. Cir. 449, 1979 Va. Cir. LEXIS 22, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oshinsky-v-standard-lakeside-corp-vaccarlington-1979.