O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurance

812 So. 2d 448, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1758, 2002 WL 236948
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2002
DocketNo. 3D01-78
StatusPublished

This text of 812 So. 2d 448 (O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurance, 812 So. 2d 448, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1758, 2002 WL 236948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In light of this Court’s decision in the underlying action, O’Shields v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 790 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), and United Automobile Insurance Company’s proper confession of error, we vacate the trial court’s final order of entitlement to attorney’s fees under section 768.79 (1997), and the final judgment on United Automobile Insurance Company’s motion for attorney’s fees.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'SHIELDS v. United Automobile Ins. Co.
790 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
812 So. 2d 448, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1758, 2002 WL 236948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oshields-v-united-automobile-insurance-fladistctapp-2002.