O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurance
This text of 812 So. 2d 448 (O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In light of this Court’s decision in the underlying action, O’Shields v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 790 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), and United Automobile Insurance Company’s proper confession of error, we vacate the trial court’s final order of entitlement to attorney’s fees under section 768.79 (1997), and the final judgment on United Automobile Insurance Company’s motion for attorney’s fees.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
812 So. 2d 448, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1758, 2002 WL 236948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oshields-v-united-automobile-insurance-fladistctapp-2002.