O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurance
812 So. 2d 448, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1758, 2002 WL 236948
Opinion
In light of this Court’s decision in the underlying action, O’Shields v. United Auto. Ins. Co., 790 So.2d 570 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001), and United Automobile Insurance Company’s proper confession of error, we vacate the trial court’s final order of entitlement to attorney’s fees under section 768.79 (1997), and the final judgment on United Automobile Insurance Company’s motion for attorney’s fees.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurance, 812 So. 2d 448, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 1758, 2002 WL 236948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
812 So. 2d 448 (O'Shields v. United Automobile Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
O'SHIELDS v. United Automobile Ins. Co.
790 So. 2d 570 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)