O'Shea v. O'Shea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

O'Shea v. O'Shea

249 A.D.2d 524, 673 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4586

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 249 A.D.2d 524 (O'Shea v. O'Shea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Shea v. O'Shea, 249 A.D.2d 524, 673 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a matrimonial action in [525]*525which the parties were divorced by judgment entered January 3, 1996, which, in effect, severed the issue of the amount of counsel fees to be awarded to the plaintiff former wife and directed a hearing on that issue, the defendant former husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), entered February 5, 1997, which, after a hearing (Kingston, J.), is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the sum of $149,923 for counsel fees.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the counsel fees awarded to the plaintiff from $149,923 to $107,340.93; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Considering the disparity in the incomes of the parties and the defendant’s tactics which unnecessarily prolonged this litigation, it was appropriate for the trial court to require the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s entire counsel fees (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879). However, the award of counsel fees should not have included the fees incurred in the preparation of the application for fees (see, Schussler v Schussler, 123 AD2d 618), or the fees incurred prior to the commencement of the divorce action (see, Conklin v Conklin, 196 App Div 607). Pizzuto, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a matrimonial action in [525]*525which the parties were divorced by judgment entered January 3, 1996, which, in effect, severed the issue of the amount of counsel fees to be awarded to the plaintiff former wife and directed a hearing on that issue, the defendant former husband appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (McCabe, J.), entered February 5, 1997, which, after a hearing (Kingston, J.), is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the sum of $149,923 for counsel fees.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the counsel fees awarded to the plaintiff from $149,923 to $107,340.93; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Considering the disparity in the incomes of the parties and the defendant’s tactics which unnecessarily prolonged this litigation, it was appropriate for the trial court to require the defendant to pay the plaintiff’s entire counsel fees (see, DeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879). However, the award of counsel fees should not have included the fees incurred in the preparation of the application for fees (see, Schussler v Schussler, 123 AD2d 618), or the fees incurred prior to the commencement of the divorce action (see, Conklin v Conklin, 196 App Div 607). Pizzuto, J. P., Joy, Friedmann and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 A.D.2d 524, 673 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oshea-v-oshea-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack