O'Shea v. Gelber

Missouri Court of Appeals

O'Shea v. Gelber

413 S.W.3d 665, 2013 WL 5744516, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1244

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. ED 99580·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Debra O’Shea (O’Shea) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Brian Gelber and Gelber, Gelber & Gelber on O’Shea’s claim for legal malpractice. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Debra O’Shea (O’Shea) appeals from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Brian Gelber and Gelber, Gelber & Gelber on O’Shea’s claim for legal malpractice. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claim of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

O'Shea v. Gelber, 413 S.W.3d 665, 2013 WL 5744516, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1244 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

413 S.W.3d 665 (O'Shea v. Gelber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.