O'Shaughnessy v. Musgrave

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

O'Shaughnessy v. Musgrave

148 P.2d 160, 194 Okla. 108, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 378

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 18, 1944

DocketNo. 31392.

StatusPublished

This text of 148 P.2d 160 (O'Shaughnessy v. Musgrave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

O'Shaughnessy v. Musgrave, 148 P.2d 160, 194 Okla. 108, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 378 (Okla. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court, and on November 4, 1943, filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in *109 error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to enter judgment in favor of I. A. O’Shaughnessy.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, HURST, DAVI-SON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the trial court, and on November 4, 1943, filed his brief. The authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in *109 error has filed no brief and has offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okla. 583, 99 P. 2d 498, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed and remanded with directions.

The cause is reversed and remanded, with directions to enter judgment in favor of I. A. O’Shaughnessy.

CORN, C. J., GIBSON, V.C.J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, HURST, DAVI-SON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 P.2d 160, 194 Okla. 108, 1944 Okla. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oshaughnessy-v-musgrave-okla-1944.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack