Osgood v. Lansil

33 Me. 360
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1851·Published

Opinion

The Court is not bound, unless requested, to give instruction as to the legal correctness of a proposition urged by counsel to the jury.

Where evidence had been given in support of a set-off claim, and a general verdict was rendered for the defendant, (without showing whether the plaintiff had failed to establish any claim or whether his demand -was balanced by the set-olf,) there is no right in the plaintiff to except, that the Judge did not give instruction to the jury in relation to the cost; unless such instruction was requested.

Where the Judge refers to the jury a question of law, which he ought himself to decide, there is no ground for exceptions, if it be decided correctly by the jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osgood v. Lansil, 33 Me. 360 (Me. 1851).

33 Me. 360 (Osgood v. Lansil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.