Oser v. CLEAR! BLUE MANAGEMENT, INC.
This text of 731 N.W.2d 774 (Oser v. CLEAR! BLUE MANAGEMENT, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dave OSER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CLEAR!BLUE MANAGEMENT, INC., and Todd Smith, Defendants-Appellees.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that ruled that the evidence established that the defendant had good cause to terminate the plaintiff. The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact whether the defendant had good cause to terminate the plaintiff. Summary disposition cannot be granted under such circumstances. MCR 2.116(C)(10); Maiden v. Rozwood, 461 Mich. 109, 120-121, 597 N.W.2d 817 (1999). We REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
731 N.W.2d 774, 478 Mich. 889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oser-v-clear-blue-management-inc-mich-2007.