Oser v. CLEAR! BLUE MANAGEMENT, INC.

731 N.W.2d 774, 478 Mich. 889
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided June 6, 2007·No. 133189·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

731 N.W.2d 774 (2007)

Dave OSER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CLEAR!BLUE MANAGEMENT, INC., and Todd Smith, Defendants-Appellees.

Docket No. 133189. COA No. 269195.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

June 6, 2007.

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 26, 2006 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we REVERSE that part of the Court of Appeals judgment that ruled that the evidence established that the defendant had good cause to terminate the plaintiff. The plaintiff presented sufficient evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact whether the defendant had good cause to terminate the plaintiff. Summary disposition cannot be granted under such circumstances. MCR 2.116(C)(10); Maiden v. Rozwood, 461 Mich. 109, 120-121, 597 N.W.2d 817 (1999). We REMAND this case to the Oakland Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oser v. CLEAR! BLUE MANAGEMENT, INC., 731 N.W.2d 774, 478 Mich. 889 (Mich. 2007).

731 N.W.2d 774 (Oser v. CLEAR! BLUE MANAGEMENT, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Johnson
731 N.W.2d 774 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2007)