Oselen v. Cain

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 21, 1998·No. 98-30096·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-30096 Summary Calendar

MORRIS OSELEN, JR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

versus

BURL CAIN, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary; RICHARD IEYOUB, Attorney General, State of Louisiana,

Respondents-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 97-CV-152-K - - - - - - - - - - August 14, 1998

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Morris Oselen, Jr., Louisiana prisoner # 87604, appeals the

district court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas

corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Following a jury trial,

Oselen was convicted of aggravated rape and was sentenced to life

imprisonment at hard labor. He argues that the State withheld

evidence material to his defense, in violation of the dictates of

Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), when it failed to disclose

the victim’s initial police report.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-30096 -2-

Having reviewed the record and Oselen’s brief, we affirm for

essentially the same reasons adopted by the district court. See

Oselen v. Cain, No. 97-152 (E.D. La. Jan. 6, 1998).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oselen v. Cain, (5th Cir. 1998).

Oselen v. Cain (Oselen v. Cain) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)