Osei v. University of Maryland University College

678 F. App'x 164
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 3, 2017
Docket16-2074
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 678 F. App'x 164 (Osei v. University of Maryland University College) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osei v. University of Maryland University College, 678 F. App'x 164 (4th Cir. 2017).

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. '

PER CURIAM:

Michael Osei seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint against the, University of Maryland University College and certain employees of the university. Parties are accorded 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal; Fed. R, App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). However, the district court may extend the time to file a notice of appeal if a party moves for an extension of the appeal period within 30 days after the expiration of the original appeal period and demonstrates excusable neglect or good cause to warrant an extension. Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5); Washington v. Bumgarner, 882 F.2d 899, 900-01 (4th Cir. 1989). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214, 127 S.Ct. 2360, 168 L.Ed.2d 96 (2007).

The district court entered its order on August 15, 2016. On September 15, 2016, Osei simultaneously filed a motion for reconsideration and a notice of appeal. Although the notice of appeal was one day *165 late, we construe Osei’s motion for reconsideration as a motion for an extension of the appeal period.

Accordingly, we remand this case to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether Osei has demonstrated excusable neglect or good cause warranting an extension of the 30-day appeal period. The record, as supplemented, will then be returned to this court for further consideration.

REMANDED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
678 F. App'x 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osei-v-university-of-maryland-university-college-ca4-2017.