Oschner v. Schunk

46 Iowa 293
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 14, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 46 Iowa 293 (Oschner v. Schunk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oschner v. Schunk, 46 Iowa 293 (iowa 1877).

Opinion

Eotiirock, J.

i practice in court-1assign* mentof error. There is but one assignment of error. It is in these words: “ The court erred in overruling the motion for a new fa'i3-!-” This assignment is not sufficiently specific to meet the requirements of Sec. 3207 of ¿]ie Q0(je- jt is there provided that, “amongseveral points in a demurrer, or in a motion, or instructions, or rulings in an exception, it must designate which is relied on as an error, and the court will only regard errors which are [294]*294assigned with the required exactness.” The motion for new trial in this case contained three points.

■ Appellees insist on their objection to the assignment of error, and we must sustain such objection.

It may be proper to remark that this result is the same át which we .would have arrived, upon a determination of the case on the merits.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Albrosky v. Iowa City
41 N.W. 23 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1888)
Town of Waukon v. Strouse
38 N.W. 408 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1888)
Wood v. Whitton
66 Iowa 295 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1885)
Hoefer v. City of Burlington
13 N.W. 294 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 Iowa 293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oschner-v-schunk-iowa-1877.