Oscar Ramirez D/B/A Blanco Grocery v. Texas State Bank

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 22, 2004
Docket13-04-00249-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Oscar Ramirez D/B/A Blanco Grocery v. Texas State Bank (Oscar Ramirez D/B/A Blanco Grocery v. Texas State Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oscar Ramirez D/B/A Blanco Grocery v. Texas State Bank, (Tex. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion



NUMBER 13-04-249-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________


OSCAR RAMIREZ D/B/A BLANCO GROCERY,                       Appellant,


v.


TEXAS STATE BANK,                                                        Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________


On appeal from County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yañez

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


         Appellant, OSCAR RAMIREZ D/B/A BLANCO GROCERY, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. One of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-40,417-A. Judgment in this cause was signed on January 21, 2004. No timely motion for new trial was filed. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant’s notice of appeal was due on February 20, 2004, but was not filed until April 23, 2004.

         Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court’s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.

         The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant’s failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant’s failure to respond to this Court’s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

                                                               PER CURIAM



Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 22nd day of July, 2004.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Oscar Ramirez D/B/A Blanco Grocery v. Texas State Bank, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oscar-ramirez-dba-blanco-grocery-v-texas-state-ban-texapp-2004.