Oscar Padilla v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

485 F. App'x 266
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 15, 2012·No. 08-75145·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in determining that Padilla may not impute his father’s lawful permanent residence for purposes of meeting the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2). See Sawyers v. Holder, 684 F.3d 911 (9th Cir.2012) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oscar Padilla v. Eric H. Holder Jr., 485 F. App'x 266 (9th Cir. 2012).

485 F. App'x 266 (Oscar Padilla v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gil v. Holder
651 F.3d 1000 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Sawyers v. Mukasey
684 F.3d 911 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)