Oscar Padilla v. Eric H. Holder Jr.

485 F. App'x 266
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedOctober 15, 2012
Docket08-75145
StatusUnpublished

This text of 485 F. App'x 266 (Oscar Padilla v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Oscar Padilla v. Eric H. Holder Jr., 485 F. App'x 266 (9th Cir. 2012).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in determining that Padilla may not impute his father’s lawful permanent residence for purposes of meeting the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2). See Sawyers v. Holder, 684 F.3d 911 (9th Cir.2012) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gil v. Holder
651 F.3d 1000 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Sawyers v. Mukasey
684 F.3d 911 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
485 F. App'x 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oscar-padilla-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca9-2012.