Oscar Padilla v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
This text of 485 F. App'x 266 (Oscar Padilla v. Eric H. Holder Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Oscar Padilla, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not err in determining that Padilla may not impute his father’s lawful permanent residence for purposes of meeting the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(2). See Sawyers v. Holder, 684 F.3d 911 (9th Cir.2012) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
485 F. App'x 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oscar-padilla-v-eric-h-holder-jr-ca9-2012.