Oscar Molinar v. Mulholland Energy Services, LLC; Mulholland Employee Holdings, LLC; And Mulholland Services Holdco, Inc.
Opinion
Opinion filed October 30, 2025
In The
Eleventh Court of Appeals
No. 11-25-00067-CV
OSCAR MOLINAR, Appellant
V.
MULHOLLAND ENERGY SERVICES, LLC; MULHOLLAND EMPLOYEE HOLDINGS, LLC; AND MULHOLLAND SERVICES HOLDCO, INC., Appellees
On Appeal from the 238th District Court Midland County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. DCV-25-00102
MEMORANDUM OPINION This interlocutory appeal arises from the trial court’s order granting Appellees’ application for a temporary injunction. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(a)(4) (West Supp. 2024). Since September 22, Appellant has filed three “[a]greed” letters informing us that the parties have been negotiating and finalizing a settlement agreement in the case below. On October 24, Appellant
informed us that the parties’ settlement agreement had been finalized and that, pursuant to Rule 162 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, Appellees had filed a notice of nonsuit of their claims against Appellant with prejudice in the trial court. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 162. In the same letter, Appellant notified us that his “interlocutory appeal is no longer necessary.”
We construe Appellant’s filing as an unopposed motion to dismiss this appeal.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Accordingly, we grant his request and dismiss the appeal.
JOHN M. BAILEY CHIEF JUSTICE
October 30, 2025 Panel consists of: Bailey, C.J., Trotter, J., and Williams, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Oscar Molinar v. Mulholland Energy Services, LLC; Mulholland Employee Holdings, LLC; And Mulholland Services Holdco, Inc. (Oscar Molinar v. Mulholland Energy Services, LLC; Mulholland Employee Holdings, LLC; And Mulholland Services Holdco, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.