Oscar Medina-Herrera v. Kristi Noem, et al.

W.D. Oklahoma

Oscar Medina-Herrera v. Kristi Noem, et al.

DecidedNovember 13, 2025

Docket5:25-cv-01203

StatusUnknown

This text of Oscar Medina-Herrera v. Kristi Noem, et al. (Oscar Medina-Herrera v. Kristi Noem, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Oscar Medina-Herrera v. Kristi Noem, et al., (W.D. Okla. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

OSCAR MEDINA-HERRERA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-1203-J ) KRISTI NOEM, et al., ) ) Respondents. )

ORDER

United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement has detained Petitioner, a Mexican citizen. Appearing with counsel, Petitioner seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 1] and requests an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO) requiring Respondents to either release him or provide him with a bond hearing. [Doc. No. 6]. The matter was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C). Judge Mitchell has reviewed the TRO motion and recommends that it be denied for lack of notice to the adverse party. [Doc. No. 12]. Despite being cautioned that he must file any objection no later than November 7, 2025, Petitioner did not object and has waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12] and DENIES Petitioner’s motion for an emergency TRO [Doc. No. 6]. This matter remains referred to Judge Mitchell. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13" day of November, 2025.

BERNARD M. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

OSCAR MEDINA-HERRERA, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-1203-J ) KRISTI NOEM, et al., ) ) Respondents. )

ORDER

United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement has detained Petitioner, a Mexican citizen. Appearing with counsel, Petitioner seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 [Doc. No. 1] and requests an emergency temporary restraining order (TRO) requiring Respondents to either release him or provide him with a bond hearing. [Doc. No. 6]. The matter was referred for initial proceedings to United States Magistrate Judge Suzanne Mitchell consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), (C). Judge Mitchell has reviewed the TRO motion and recommends that it be denied for lack of notice to the adverse party. [Doc. No. 12]. Despite being cautioned that he must file any objection no later than November 7, 2025, Petitioner did not object and has waived his right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. See Casanova v. Ulibarri, 595 F.3d 1120, 1123 (10th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 12] and DENIES Petitioner’s motion for an emergency TRO [Doc. No. 6]. This matter remains referred to Judge Mitchell. IT IS SO ORDERED this 13" day of November, 2025.

BERNARD M. JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Oscar Medina-Herrera v. Kristi Noem, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oscar-medina-herrera-v-kristi-noem-et-al-okwd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack