Oscar G. Hernandez v. State
This text of Oscar G. Hernandez v. State (Oscar G. Hernandez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NUMBER 13-20-00197-CR
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG
OSCAR G. HERNANDEZ, Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.
On appeal from the 226th District Court of Bexar County, Texas.
ORDER Before Justices Benavides, Hinojosa, and Silva Order Per Curiam
On March 3, 2021, counsel for appellant filed an Anders brief and a motion to
withdraw in this cause. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738,744 (1967). On March
9, 2021 and March 29, 2021, the Clerk of this Court issued notices to appellant’s
counsel, the Honorable Patrick Montgomery, that the brief filed was not in compliance
with Kelly v State, 436 S.W.3d 313 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014). Specifically, we noted that Mr. Montgomery provided appellant with the mailing address for this Court in order to
return the form motion for pro se access to the appellate record. See Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and Kelly, 436 S.W.3d 313. To date, Mr. Montgomery
has failed to comply with this Court’s instructions.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Honorable Patrick Montgomery,
counselor for appellant, file documentary evidence in compliance with the above-
referenced requirements with this Court on or before ten (10) days after the date of this
order.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Delivered and filed on the 21st day April, 2021.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Oscar G. Hernandez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oscar-g-hernandez-v-state-texapp-2021.