Oscar Feldman, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Oscar Feldman, Inc. v. United States

30 Cust. Ct. 398, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 246

United States Customs Court·Decided March 26, 1953·No. No. 57214; protests 955902-G, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates (except the merchandise invoiced as white kid head plates on the invoice of entry 81287 covered by protest 154020-K) are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained. In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates (except the merchandise invoiced as white kid head plates on the invoice of entry 81287 covered by protest 154020-K) are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Kung Chen Fur Corpn. v. United States (29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained. In all other respects the protests were overruled.

Ford, J., concurred. Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, supra.

Oscar Feldman, Inc. v. United States, 30 Cust. Ct. 398, 1953 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 246 (cusc 1953).

Pincite

30 Cust. Ct. 398 (Oscar Feldman, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related