Oscar Enrique Nunez Euceda v. United States

District Court, C.D. California·Decided June 22, 2022·No. 2:20-cv-10793·Unknown

Opinion

Case 2:20-cv-10793-VAP-GJS Document 46 Filed 06/22/22 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #:286 1

2 3 4 5 6 7 11 Oscar Enrique Nuñez Euceda, CASE NO. 2:20-cv-10793 VAP (GJSx) 12 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 13 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER1 14 United States of America, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 This Stipulated Protective Order is substantially based on the model protective order provided under Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish’s Procedures. Case 2:20-cv-10793-VAP-GJS Document 46 Filed 06/22/22 Page 2 of 18 Page ID #:287

1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary 3 or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 4 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 5 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated 6 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 7 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 8 from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 9 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. 11 This action is likely to involve 12 (a) a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial 13 information as such terms are used in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 626(c)(1)(G); 14 (b) personal financial, medical or other private information relating to an 15 individual that would properly be redacted from any public court filing pursuant to 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2., including any document, information, or tangible 17 thing protected by the provisions of the Family and Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 18 20 U.S.C. § 1232g, 34 C.F.R. Part 99; certain individually identifiable health 19 information (defined as health information that is connected to a patient’s name, address, 20 Social Security number, or other identifying number, including Health Insurance Claim 21 (HIC) number) that may be subject to the provisions of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a; 22 the provisions of 45 C.F.R. §§ 164.102-164.534 (regulations promulgated pursuant to 23 the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA)); or health 24 information for which there may be no waiver by the patient to produce the records to 25 an entity outside one of the Parties; 26 (c) information protected by the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C 27 § 552a; 28 1 Case 2:20-cv-10793-VAP-GJS Document 46 Filed 06/22/22 Page 3 of 18 Page ID #:288

11 (d) information contained in individual detainee files (e.g., “A Files”) that 22 would be protected by the Privacy Act or any other information or documents that would 33 be covered by the Privacy Act if the subject of the information had been a U.S. citizen 44 or a person lawfully admitted for permanent residence; 55 (e) plaintiffs’ administrative tort claims (Standard Form 95 or “SF-95”) and 66 attachments to those claims; 77 (f) sensitive information about Defendant’s law enforcement or national 88 security staffing, resources, intelligence and/or methods (including the names and 99 contact information of third parties, and non-supervisory federal and non-federal 1100 employees), the release of which to the public may adversely impact identifiable law 1111 enforcement or national security interests; 1122 (g) information pertaining to applications for asylum or withholding of 1133 removal, which are subject to disclosure conditions under 8 C.F.R. §§ 1003.27(c) and 1144 1208.6(a), as well as information pertaining to: (1) applications for Temporary Protected 1155 Status under 8 U.S.C. § 1254a; and (2) information that relates to an alien who is the 1166 beneficiary of an application for relief under 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(15)(T), (15)(U), (51) 1177 or 15 1229b(b)(2); 1188 (h) documents that were produced in other District Court actions that are 1199 subject to protective orders entered into by other District Courts; and 2200 (i) any other information that is protected or restricted from disclosure by 2211 Court order, statutes, rules, or regulations, including, but not limited to: 8 U.S.C. §§ 2222 1160(b)(5); 1186a(c)(4), 1202(f), 1254a(c)(6), 1255a(c)(4), (5); 304(b), and 1367(a)(2), 2233 (b), (c), (d); 22 U.S.C. § 7105(c)(1)(C); 8 C.F.R. 20 §§ 208.6, 210.2(e), 214.11(e), 2244 214.14(e), 216.5(e)(3)(viii), 236.6, 244.16, 245a.2(t), 245a.3(n), 245a.21, 1003.27(b)- 2255 (d), 1003.46, 1208.6, 28 C.F.R.§ 0.29f, which otherwise could subject either party to 2266 civil or criminal penalties or other sanctions in the event of unauthorized disclosure. 2277 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 2288 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect 2 Case 2:20-cv-10793-VAP-GJS Document 46 Filed 06/22/22 Page 4 of 18 Page ID #:289

11 information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are 22 permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the 33 conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends 44 of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent 55 of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons 66 and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained 77 in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part 88 of the public record of this case. 1100 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this 1111 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under 1122 seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the 1133 standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 1144 material under seal. 1155 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 1166 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive motions, good 1177 cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana v. City and County 1188 of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307 1199 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oscar Enrique Nunez Euceda v. United States, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Oscar Enrique Nunez Euceda v. United States (Oscar Enrique Nunez Euceda v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)