Oscar Castillo v. State of Florida
This text of Oscar Castillo v. State of Florida (Oscar Castillo v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2025-0553 Lower Tribunal No. 2024-CF-014893 _____________________________
OSCAR CASTILLO,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County. Bruce Kyle, Judge.
June 5, 2026
WOZNIAK, J.
Oscar Castillo appeals the order denying his Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.170(l) motion to withdraw plea. He argues that the trial court erred in
imposing a more severe sentence than agreed to in his Quarterman 1 agreement based
on his failure to appear at the sentencing hearing and for committing new law
violations during the two-week period between his plea hearing and the deferred
1 Quarterman v. State, 527 So. 2d 1380 (Fla. 1988). sentencing hearing. Because Castillo failed to properly preserve either issue, we
affirm. We do so without prejudice to Castillo filing a Florida Rule of Criminal
Procedure 3.850 motion.
AFFIRMED.
BROWNLEE and PRATT, JJ., concur.
Terry McCreary, of The McCreary Law Firm, P.A., Kaukauna, Wisconsin, for Appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Laura Dempsey, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Oscar Castillo v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/oscar-castillo-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.