Osburn v. United States Internal Revenue Service
This text of 57 F. App'x 340 (Osburn v. United States Internal Revenue Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Chapter 7 debtors Coleman M. Osburn and Lola M. Osburn appeal pro se the district court’s judgment affirming the bankruptcy court’s summary judgment in favor of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in their adversary proceeding seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and damages. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 158(d). We review de novo, DeRoche v. Arizona Industrial Commission (In re DeRoche), 287 F.3d 751, 754 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.
Summary judgment was proper because the Osburns failed to raise a genuine issue of material fact as to whether the IRS failed to make timely assessments against them, see 26 U.S.C. § 6501(c), or whether the IRS failed to follow proper procedures when it levied on their residence, see 26 U.S.C. § 6334(e).
Appellants’ remaining contentions lack merit.
Appellee’s motion to strike is denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
57 F. App'x 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osburn-v-united-states-internal-revenue-service-ca9-2003.