Osburn v. Rogers

23 La. Ann. 167
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedFebruary 15, 1871
DocketNo. 3171
StatusPublished

This text of 23 La. Ann. 167 (Osburn v. Rogers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osburn v. Rogers, 23 La. Ann. 167 (La. 1871).

Opinion

Wyly, J.

The plaintiff seeks to annul the judgment appointing the defendant tutor of the minor, Mary C. Osburn, on the ground that he, the under-tutor, was not present at the deliberations of the family meeting which advised the appointment.

The court gave judgment for the defendant and the plaintiff has .appealed.

The evidence shows that the under-tutor, after neglecting to have a tutor appointed for the minor for fifteen months, refused to attend the family meeting, provoked by the mother of the minor, for the appointment of a tutor, although he was duly summoned to attend the said family meeting.

It is evident from the record that he now seeks to make his own •dereliction of duty the ground for annulling the judgment appointing as tutor the defendant, who is the stepfather of the minor. There is no merit in his demand.

Let the judgment of the court below be affirmed with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 La. Ann. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osburn-v-rogers-la-1871.