Osbourne v. State
588 So. 2d 517, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1162, 1991 WL 119376
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Osbourne v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 171 →
Opinion
ON RETURN TO REMAND
We remanded this case, 588 So.2d 516, so that the trial court could make findings as to the reasons why the appellant’s probation was revoked. The trial court has fully complied with our instructions, thereby fulfilling the requirements of Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). The revocation of the appellant’s probation is affirmed.
OPINION EXTENDED; AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osbourne v. State, 588 So. 2d 517, 1991 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1162, 1991 WL 119376 (Ala. Ct. App. 1991).
588 So. 2d 517 (Osbourne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Morrissey v. Brewer
408 U.S. 471 (Supreme Court, 1972)
Gagnon v. Scarpelli
411 U.S. 778 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Osbourne v. State
588 So. 2d 516 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1991)