Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Osbourne v. Durrant

Osbourne v. Durrant

113 So. 3d 955, 2013 WL 557103, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2411
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 15, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-3506
StatusPublished

This text of 113 So. 3d 955 (Osbourne v. Durrant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osbourne v. Durrant, 113 So. 3d 955, 2013 WL 557103, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2411 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979) (holding that in appellate proceedings, trial court’s decision carries presumption of correctness and appellant has burden to bring forth adequate record to demonstrate error).

ORFINGER, C.J., GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 So. 3d 955, 2013 WL 557103, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 2411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osbourne-v-durrant-fladistctapp-2013.