Osborne v. WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE

738 N.W.2d 718, 480 Mich. 894, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2215
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 24, 2007
Docket134741
StatusPublished

This text of 738 N.W.2d 718 (Osborne v. WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborne v. WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE, 738 N.W.2d 718, 480 Mich. 894, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2215 (Mich. 2007).

Opinion

738 N.W.2d 718 (2007)

Amanda Jean OSBORNE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WASHTENAW CIRCUIT JUDGE, Defendant-Appellee.

Docket No. 134741. COA No. 279204.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

September 24, 2007.

On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. The complaint for superintending control, treated as an application for leave to appeal the July 20, 2007 order of the Court of Appeals, is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for stay is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
738 N.W.2d 718, 480 Mich. 894, 2007 Mich. LEXIS 2215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-washtenaw-circuit-judge-mich-2007.