Osborne v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Osborne v. State

1917 OK CR 201, 169 P. 270, 14 Okla. Crim. 173, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedDecember 28, 1917

DocketNo. A-2772.

StatusPublished

This text of 1917 OK CR 201 (Osborne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborne v. State, 1917 OK CR 201, 169 P. 270, 14 Okla. Crim. 173, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220 (Okla. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

MATSÓN, J.

Annie Osborne, the plaintiff in error, was convicted in the district court of Atoka county of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentenced to serve four years’ imprisonment in the state penitentiary. She was charged with the murder of one America Lynch. The parties were all negroes, and the evidence discloses that the deceased had for some years been intimate with the husband of the plaintiff in error, and the killing arose out of this unlawful relationship. No appearance was made at the time this case was assigned for oral argument, nor have counsel filed any brief in behalf of the plaintiff in error. The court has examined carefully the pleadings, instructions, judgment, and sentence and the evidence in the case, and no error has been. *174 discovered of such a nature as to authorize a reversal of this judgment under rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x).

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MATSÓN, J.

Annie Osborne, the plaintiff in error, was convicted in the district court of Atoka county of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree, and sentenced to serve four years’ imprisonment in the state penitentiary. She was charged with the murder of one America Lynch. The parties were all negroes, and the evidence discloses that the deceased had for some years been intimate with the husband of the plaintiff in error, and the killing arose out of this unlawful relationship. No appearance was made at the time this case was assigned for oral argument, nor have counsel filed any brief in behalf of the plaintiff in error. The court has examined carefully the pleadings, instructions, judgment, and sentence and the evidence in the case, and no error has been. *174 discovered of such a nature as to authorize a reversal of this judgment under rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x).

The judgment is therefore affirmed.

DOYLE, P. J., and ARMSTRONG, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1917 OK CR 201, 169 P. 270, 14 Okla. Crim. 173, 1917 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 220, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-state-oklacrimapp-1917.