Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.

7 S.E.2d 500, 217 N.C. 263, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 216
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided March 6, 1940·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal presents no new question of law. Even though plaintiff may have instituted the original action within three years from the time of the accrual of his cause of action against defendant, and this action within one year from the date of judgment of non-suit in original action, the record as constituted on this appeal fails to show facts which would entitle him to maintain this action under the provisions of C. S., 415. Bradshaw v. Bank, 172 N. C., 632, 90 S. E., 789; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32; Jackson v. Harvester Co., 188 N. C., 275, 124 S. E., 334; Young v. R. R., 189 N. C., 238, 126 S. E., 600; Southerland v. Crump, 199 N. C., 111, 153 S. E., 845.

Counsel for plaintiff in oral argument frankly so concede. Hence, it is unnecessary to consider other points discussed in brief filed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osborne v. Southern Railway Co., 7 S.E.2d 500, 217 N.C. 263, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 216 (N.C. 1940).

7 S.E.2d 500 (Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Galligan v. Smith
188 S.E.2d 31 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Sheppard v. Barrus Construction Co.
181 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Nowell v. Hamilton
107 S.E.2d 112 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)