Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.
This text of 7 S.E.2d 500 (Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal presents no new question of law. Even though plaintiff may have instituted the original action within three years from the time of the accrual of his cause of action against defendant, and this action within one year from the date of judgment of non-suit in original action, the record as constituted on this appeal fails to show facts which would entitle him to maintain this action under the provisions of C. S., 415. Bradshaw v. Bank, 172 N. C., 632, 90 S. E., 789; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32; Jackson v. Harvester Co., 188 N. C., 275, 124 S. E., 334; Young v. R. R., 189 N. C., 238, 126 S. E., 600; Southerland v. Crump, 199 N. C., 111, 153 S. E., 845.
Counsel for plaintiff in oral argument frankly so concede. Hence, it is unnecessary to consider other points discussed in brief filed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 S.E.2d 500, 217 N.C. 263, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-southern-railway-co-nc-1940.