Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.

7 S.E.2d 500, 217 N.C. 263, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 216
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 6, 1940
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 7 S.E.2d 500 (Osborne v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborne v. Southern Railway Co., 7 S.E.2d 500, 217 N.C. 263, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 216 (N.C. 1940).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal presents no new question of law. Even though plaintiff may have instituted the original action within three years from the time of the accrual of his cause of action against defendant, and this action within one year from the date of judgment of non-suit in original action, the record as constituted on this appeal fails to show facts which would entitle him to maintain this action under the provisions of C. S., 415. Bradshaw v. Bank, 172 N. C., 632, 90 S. E., 789; Rankin v. Oates, 183 N. C., 517, 112 S. E., 32; Jackson v. Harvester Co., 188 N. C., 275, 124 S. E., 334; Young v. R. R., 189 N. C., 238, 126 S. E., 600; Southerland v. Crump, 199 N. C., 111, 153 S. E., 845.

Counsel for plaintiff in oral argument frankly so concede. Hence, it is unnecessary to consider other points discussed in brief filed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Galligan v. Smith
188 S.E.2d 31 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)
Sheppard v. Barrus Construction Co.
181 S.E.2d 130 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1971)
Nowell v. Hamilton
107 S.E.2d 112 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 S.E.2d 500, 217 N.C. 263, 1940 N.C. LEXIS 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-southern-railway-co-nc-1940.