Osborne v. Osborne

240 S.E.2d 704, 240 Ga. 321, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1494
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedDecember 5, 1977
Docket32982
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 S.E.2d 704 (Osborne v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborne v. Osborne, 240 S.E.2d 704, 240 Ga. 321, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1494 (Ga. 1977).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a continuance due to appellant’s alleged illness. Code Ann. §§ 81-1412, 81-1419; Williford v. Williford, 230 Ga. 543 (198 SE2d 181) (1973).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wayne Smith Construction Co. v. Wolman, Duberstein, & Thompson
363 S.E.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 S.E.2d 704, 240 Ga. 321, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-osborne-ga-1977.