Osborne v. Osborne
240 S.E.2d 704, 240 Ga. 321, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1494
Opinion
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for a continuance due to appellant’s alleged illness. Code Ann. §§ 81-1412, 81-1419; Williford v. Williford, 230 Ga. 543 (198 SE2d 181) (1973).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Osborne v. Osborne, 240 S.E.2d 704, 240 Ga. 321, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1494 (Ga. 1977).
240 S.E.2d 704 (Osborne v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wayne Smith Construction Co. v. Wolman, Duberstein, & Thompson
363 S.E.2d 115 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1987)