Osborne v. New York Mutual Insurance

6 N.Y. St. Rep. 870
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 15, 1887·Published

Opinion

Pratt, J.

As pointed out in the opinion at special term, the application seeks for the details of plaintiff’s evidence and not for the items of plaintiff’s claim.

[871]*871The claim of plaintiff is for a total loss, whereby the sum of $2,000 became payable.

if defendants seek to avail themselves of such knowledge as plaintiff may . have concerning the details of damage sustained, they must seek another method.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Barnard, P. J., and Dykman, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osborne v. New York Mutual Insurance, 6 N.Y. St. Rep. 870 (N.Y. 1887).

6 N.Y. St. Rep. 870 (Osborne v. New York Mutual Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.