Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Corporation

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Corporation

31 So. 2d 456, 1947 La. App. LEXIS 464

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 30, 1947

DocketNo. 2904.

StatusPublished

This text of 31 So. 2d 456 (Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Corporation, 31 So. 2d 456, 1947 La. App. LEXIS 464 (La. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day handed down in the consolidated cases of Sarah B. Osborne and Thelbert E. Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Corporation et al., it is ordered that the judgment in favor of the plaintiff is reduced to the sum of $257.50, the said amount to be as an off-set of the judgment in favor of the defendant on the reconventional demand, and as thus amended it is affirmed.

It is further ordered that the judgment in favor of the defendant on the reconventional demand be and the same is hereby affirmed.

It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this appeal; all other costs to be paid by the plaintiff and the defendant in equal proportion, or one-half by each.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

For the reasons assigned in the opinion this day handed down in the consolidated cases of Sarah B. Osborne and Thelbert E. Osborne v. Mossler Acceptance Corporation et al., it is ordered that the judgment in favor of the plaintiff is reduced to the sum of $257.50, the said amount to be as an off-set of the judgment in favor of the defendant on the reconventional demand, and as thus amended it is affirmed.

It is further ordered that the judgment in favor of the defendant on the reconventional demand be and the same is hereby affirmed.

It is further ordered that the plaintiff pay the costs of this appeal; all other costs to be paid by the plaintiff and the defendant in equal proportion, or one-half by each.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 So. 2d 456, 1947 La. App. LEXIS 464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-mossler-acceptance-corporation-lactapp-1947.