Osborne v. Employment Security Dept.

Nevada Supreme Court

Osborne v. Employment Security Dept.

502 P.2d 986, 88 Nev. 588

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 16, 1972·No. No. 6837·Published

Opinion

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the record does not support a decision of the Board of Review, Employment Security Department, the effect of which was to deny him unemployment benefits in the sum of $599. In our view, said decision is supported by substantial evidence, which warranted a determination that twice within a two week period, in order to obtain unreduced benefits, appellant falsely stated he had been totally unemployed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION

Per Curiam:

Appellant’s sole contention on appeal is that the record does not support a decision of the Board of Review, Employment Security Department, the effect of which was to deny him unemployment benefits in the sum of $599. In our view, said decision is supported by substantial evidence, which warranted a determination that twice within a two week period, in order to obtain unreduced benefits, appellant falsely stated he had been totally unemployed.

Affirmed.

Osborne v. Employment Security Dept., 502 P.2d 986, 88 Nev. 588 (Neb. 1972).

Pincite

502 P.2d 986 (Osborne v. Employment Security Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.