Osborne v. Dickey

71 S.E. 763, 9 Ga. App. 469, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 185
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 29, 1911·No. 3030·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Russell, J.

1. The members of a committee who undertake to act in behalf of an unincorporated association in contracting for a banquet are individually liable upon the contract; and even if a committee so contracting were authorized to act for a corporation, but that fact was not brought to the knowledge of the opposite contracting party at the time of the contract, he could, at his option, proceed against the individuals composing the committee.

2. There was no error in the admission of the testimony, or in the charge of the court. The evidence authorized the verdict, and there was no error in refusing a new trial. Judgment ajfti'med.

Complaint; from city court of Fitzgerald — Judge Wall. September 22, 1910. Uaygood & Cults, for plaintiffs in error. Bllcins & Wall, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osborne v. Dickey, 71 S.E. 763, 9 Ga. App. 469, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 185 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

71 S.E. 763 (Osborne v. Dickey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Medlin v. Ebenezer Methodist Church
129 S.E. 830 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1925)
Cousin v. Taylor
239 P. 96 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1925)