Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided September 30, 2021·No. 2:21-cv-00387·Unknown

Opinion

WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON MARY E. OSBORNE, Civil No. 2:21-00387-RSM Plaintiff, vs. ORDER ON STIPLUATED MOTION FOR COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL

Defendant.

Plaintiff Mary E. Osborne filed a stipulated motion, seeking an award of $1,025.95 in attorney’s fees and $400 in costs. For the reasons set forth in the stipulated motion, supporting affirmation, and good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: Plaintiff is granted attorney’s fees in the amount of $1,025.95 under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and $400 in costs. Any award of EAJA fees shall be subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)) pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010). Costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920 shall be payable to Charles E. Binder via electronic fund transfer or check.

Page 1 ORDER ON STIPLUATED MOTION FOR FEES AND DATED this 30th day of September, 2021.

A RICARDO S. MARTINEZ CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

/s/ Daniel S. Jones Law Office of Charles E. Binder and Harry J. Binder, LLP 485 Madison Avenue, Suite 501 New York, NY 10022 (212)-677-6801 Fax (646)-273-2196 Fedcourt@binderlawfirm.com PRO HAC VICE /s/ Maury A. Kroontje Kroontje Law Office PLLC 600 University Street, Suite 1700 Seattle, WA 98101 206-624-6212 Fax: 206-624-6816 Email: maury@kroontje.net

Page 2 ORDER ON STIPLUATED MOTION FOR FEES AND

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security (Osborne v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)