Osborne v. Cardeza
71 A.D. 622, 76 N.Y.S. 1021
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1902
StatusPublished
This text of 71 A.D. 622 (Osborne v. Cardeza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Osborne v. Cardeza, 71 A.D. 622, 76 N.Y.S. 1021 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1902).
Opinion
Motion for writ of prohibition denied, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the appropriate remedy is by appeal. (See People ex rel. Mayor v. Nichols, 79 N. Y. 582.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
The People Ex Rel. the Mayor v. . Nichols
79 N.Y. 582 (New York Court of Appeals, 1880)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 A.D. 622, 76 N.Y.S. 1021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-cardeza-nyappdiv-1902.