Osborne v. Buck's Moving & Storage
This text of 441 N.W.2d 906 (Osborne v. Buck's Moving & Storage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sillis Jim OSBORNE, Appellant,
v.
BUCK'S MOVING & STORAGE, INC., Appellee.
Supreme Court of Nebraska.
Thomas R. Lamb, of Berry, Anderson, Creager & Wittstruck, P.C., for appellant.
John R. Hoffert, of Knudsen, Berkheimer, Richardson & Endacott, for appellee.
HASTINGS, C.J., and BOSLAUGH, WHITE, CAPORALE, SHANAHAN, GRANT and FAHRNBRUCH, JJ.
SHANAHAN, Justice.
On rehearing, the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court dismissed the petition of Sillis Jim Osborne because Osborne failed to prove that his "injuries ... were the result of an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment." Osborne appeals, claiming that the judgment of the Workers' Compensation Court is incorrect.
"Findings of fact made by the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court after rehearing have the same force and effect as a jury verdict in a civil case. [Citations omitted.] In testing the sufficiency of evidence to support findings of fact made by the Nebraska Workers' Compensation Court after rehearing, the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to the successful party.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
441 N.W.2d 906, 232 Neb. 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-bucks-moving-storage-neb-1989.