Osborne v. Borough of Spring Lake

64 N.J.L. 362, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 123
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMarch 5, 1900
StatusPublished

This text of 64 N.J.L. 362 (Osborne v. Borough of Spring Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborne v. Borough of Spring Lake, 64 N.J.L. 362, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 123 (N.J. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment of the Supreme Court is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the memorandum filed in that court.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Depue, Yak Syckel, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Yredenburgh. 11.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 N.J.L. 362, 1900 N.J. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-v-borough-of-spring-lake-nj-1900.