Osborne (Marco) v. Dist. Ct. (State)
This text of Osborne (Marco) v. Dist. Ct. (State) (Osborne (Marco) v. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
638, 640, 747 P.2d 1386, 1387 (1987); see also State ex rel. Schumacher v. First Judicial Dist. Court, 77 Nev. 408, 411-12, 365 P.2d 646, 648 (1961) ("Although containing words of a mandatory nature with respect to when the writ shall be issued, NRS 34.020 does not curtail the right of this court to refuse to exercise its constitutional power when the necessity therefor does not appear."). We recently considered the constitutionality of the warrantless, nonconsensual search provided for in NRS 484C.160(7) and held it unconstitutional. See Byars v. State, 130 Nev. , 336 P.3d 939, 946 (2014). As we have determined the constitutionality of NRS 484C.160(7), we conclude that writ review is unwarranted. Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DISMISSED.
Liaj:t Parraguirre r arj '
J. J. Douglas
cc: Hon. Scott N. Freeman, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
SUPREME COUFtT OF NEVADA 2 (0) L947A FPO.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Osborne (Marco) v. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-marco-v-dist-ct-state-nev-2015.