Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. Bundy
127 S.E. 516, 189 N.C. 837, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 422
This text of 127 S.E. 516 (Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. Bundy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Osborne Ex Rel. Osborne v. Bundy, 127 S.E. 516, 189 N.C. 837, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 422 (N.C. 1925).
Opinion
Tbe defendant is engaged in tbe mercantile business at Oakdale Cotton Mills and operates a Ford car for tbe delivery of packages, and is sued for personal injury alleged to bave been caused by tbe negligence of bis driver. An inspection of tbe record reveals no sufficient evidence of actionable negligence, and for tbis reason tbe judgment is ,
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Hunt ex rel. Hunt v. Wooten
76 S.E.2d 326 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Hunt v. Wooten
76 S.E.2d 326 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1953)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 516, 189 N.C. 837, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborne-ex-rel-osborne-v-bundy-nc-1925.