Osborn v. Walker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Osborn v. Walker

261 So. 2d 47, 288 Ala. 374, 1972 Ala. LEXIS 1231

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedFebruary 24, 1972

Docket6 Div. 919

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 So. 2d 47 (Osborn v. Walker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborn v. Walker, 261 So. 2d 47, 288 Ala. 374, 1972 Ala. LEXIS 1231 (Ala. 1972).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal from a decree in equity, dated June 18, 1971, which overrules their application for rehearing.

The decree does not modify the decree to which the application for rehearing is addressed.

In the absence of a modification, the decree is not appealable. Equity Rule 62, [375]*375Recompiled Code 1958, Appendix, page 1272; Money v. Galloway, 236 Ala. 55[5], 181 So. 252; Whitman v. Whitman, 253 Ala. 643[3], 46 So.2d 422; Wood, Wire & Metal Lathers, etc. v. Brown & Root, Inc., 258 Ala. 430[3], 63 So.2d 372.

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Money v. Galloway, supra.

The foregoing opinion was prepared by BOWEN W. SIMMONS, Supernumerary Circuit Judge, and was adopted by the Court as its opinion.

Appeal dismissed.

HEFLIN, C. J., and COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH and McCALL, JJ., concur.

Application for rehearing denied.

LAWSON, MERRILL, COLEMAN, HARWOOD, BLOODWORTH and McCALL, JJ., concur. HEFLIN, C. J. and MADDOX, J., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI