Home/The Superior Court of New York City/Osborn v. Universal Life Insurance

Osborn v. Universal Life Insurance

14 Jones & S. 563
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided April 5, 1880·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

That part of the order from which the plaintiff appealed should be reversed, such reversal having been consented to by the defendant on the argument, and the remaining part, from which the defendant appealed, should be affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osborn v. Universal Life Insurance, 14 Jones & S. 563 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

14 Jones & S. 563 (Osborn v. Universal Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.