Osborn v. Universal Life Insurance

14 Jones & S. 563
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedApril 5, 1880
StatusPublished

This text of 14 Jones & S. 563 (Osborn v. Universal Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborn v. Universal Life Insurance, 14 Jones & S. 563 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1880).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

That part of the order from which the plaintiff appealed should be reversed, such reversal having been consented to by the defendant on the argument, and the remaining part, from which the defendant appealed, should be affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Jones & S. 563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-universal-life-insurance-nysuperctnyc-1880.