Osborn v. United States

555 F. App'x 266
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 25, 2014
DocketNo. 13-2385
StatusPublished

This text of 555 F. App'x 266 (Osborn v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Osborn v. United States, 555 F. App'x 266 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ramona Claire Osborn, John Henry Osborn, II, and Roberta Lynn Osborn appeal the district court’s order denying relief on their civil complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Osborn v. United States, No. l:13-cv-02159-RDB (D.Md. Sept. 30, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
555 F. App'x 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-united-states-ca4-2014.