Osborn v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Osborn v. State

94 S.W. 900, 50 Tex. Crim. 46, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 16, 1906

DocketNo. 3267.

StatusPublished

This text of 94 S.W. 900 (Osborn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Osborn v. State, 94 S.W. 900, 50 Tex. Crim. 46, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196 (Tex. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. Appellant insists that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence. The evidence is overwhelming in its support of thtestimony of the accomplice.

Appellant also urges in his motion for new trial that the court erred in permitting the State, over the objection of appellant, to prove that defendant associated with lewd negro women. We find no bill presenting this question. Furthermore, the evidence is conclusive as to the guilt of the defendant, and the State seemed merely to have insisted on proving where he lived and with whom he associated. This is germane and proper testimony. No error appearing in this record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary. Appellant insists that the verdict of the jury is contrary to the law and the evidence. The evidence is overwhelming in its support of thtestimony of the accomplice.

Appellant also urges in his motion for new trial that the court erred in permitting the State, over the objection of appellant, to prove that defendant associated with lewd negro women. We find no bill presenting this question. Furthermore, the evidence is conclusive as to the guilt of the defendant, and the State seemed merely to have insisted on proving where he lived and with whom he associated. This is germane and proper testimony. No error appearing in this record, the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

94 S.W. 900, 50 Tex. Crim. 46, 1906 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/osborn-v-state-texcrimapp-1906.