Osborn v. Scottish-American Co.

60 P. 49, 22 Wash. 83, 1900 Wash. LEXIS 218
Washington Supreme Court·Decided January 13, 1900·No. No. 3384·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[84] The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dunbar, J.

We think, under the judgment in this case, exact justice was accorded all the parties litigant; that appellant received what its mortgage called for; and that, so far as the claim of respondent is concerned in the cross appeal, the cases cited do not apply to the facts as shown by the record; and that inasmuch as the mortgage described the property as lot 4 in block 3, according to the recorded plat thereof; and the said recorded plat described lot 4 in block 3 as being a lot fifty by one hundred and twenty feet, the description was plain and unambiguous, and could be relied upon; and that subsequently acquired title to sufficient land to meet the description in the mortgage should inure to the benefit of the mortgagee.

The judgment is affirmed.

Gobdon, O. J., and Eullebton and Reavis, JJ.,, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Osborn v. Scottish-American Co., 60 P. 49, 22 Wash. 83, 1900 Wash. LEXIS 218 (Wash. 1900).

60 P. 49 (Osborn v. Scottish-American Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Davis v. Starkenburg
105 P.2d 54 (Washington Supreme Court, 1940)
Everly v. Wold
217 P. 7 (Washington Supreme Court, 1923)
American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Helgesen
116 P. 837 (Washington Supreme Court, 1911)
Peoples Savings Bank v. Lewis
79 P. 932 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)