Osborn v. Osborn

Nebraska Supreme Court

Osborn v. Osborn

435 N.W.2d 914, 231 Neb. 280, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 74

Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided February 24, 1989·No. No. 87-216·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondent-appellant husband, Vance L. Osborn, assigns as error the district court’s failure to modify the alimony payments previously awarded the petitioner-appellee wife, Vivian Osborn.

We, as we are required, have reviewed the trial court’s action de novo on the record; we determine therefrom that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the husband’s application. Accordingly, the action of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The respondent-appellant husband, Vance L. Osborn, assigns as error the district court’s failure to modify the alimony payments previously awarded the petitioner-appellee wife, Vivian Osborn.

We, as we are required, have reviewed the trial court’s action de novo on the record; we determine therefrom that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the husband’s application. Accordingly, the action of the trial court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Osborn v. Osborn, 435 N.W.2d 914, 231 Neb. 280, 1989 Neb. LEXIS 74 (Neb. 1989).

Pincite

435 N.W.2d 914 (Osborn v. Osborn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.